An AI-Driven O&M Framework for Telecom Networks

An AI-Driven O&M Framework for Telecom Networks

Contemporary telecommunication networks (TNs) are large, heterogeneous infrastructures (5G, fiber, cloud RAN, IoT, etc.) whose operation and maintenance (O&M) require intelligence and automation. TelOps is a telecom-focused AIOps framework that leverages AI/ML for TN O&M, methodically integrating network mechanism, data, and expert knowledge. In contrast to generic IT AIOps, TelOps directly tackles TN issues – topology dependence, device/software heterogeneity, and limited failure data. For instance, TN failures get corrected instantly, so labeled fault logs are scarce. TelOps prescribes layering O&M functions (application, ML, knowledge, data, physical) to infuse telecom domain knowledge into AI models. In a proof-of-concept on an actual mobile access network, TelOps increased diagnosis accuracy by ≈28% by using knowledge-augmented ML.

Telecom Network Complexities

Telecom networks are extremely dynamic and distributed. They connect wired backbones (WAN/MAN) to heterogeneous wireless RANs (4G/5G) and IoT/edge segments. Dynamism in this case implies that network topology constantly changes (cells handover, links re-route), so components become topologically interdependent. Additionally, TN infrastructure is heterogeneous: multi-vendor hardware and protocols coexist (e.g. heterogeneous base stations, routers, optical devices). Such heterogeneity multiplies data sources (vendor logs, counters, alarms) and makes one-size-fits-all solutions impractical. Lastly, TN O&M has to keep up with real-time performance and reliability requirements. AI algorithms such as RNNs/LSTMs and Autoencoders are particularly suited to the high-volume, low-latency data streams of telecom, supporting continuous anomaly monitoring. Overall, TNs are hybrid (heterogeneous), large-scale systems whose topology, heterogeneity, and real-time requirements all transcend those of usual cloud datacenters.

The TelOps Layered Architecture

TelOps uses a layered architecture (Figure 1) extending from the physical network to O&M applications.

Figure 1: The TelOps layered architecture. The framework extends from the physical layer (human experts + network), a data layer (runtime logs, performance data), a knowledge layer (domain models and expert heuristics), a machine learning layer (AI models), to the application layer (preventive/reactive O&M tasks). Here, the data layer captures the live TN and human operators; the physical layer collects raw telemetry (device logs, KPIs, traces) from all network elements. The knowledge layer captures telecom domain knowledge: mechanism knowledge (network topology, protocol models) and empirical knowledge (expert rules, fault propagation models). These observations are synthesized into features and models that inform the AI layer. Specialized AI algorithms are then applied by the machine learning layer to O&M activities – e.g. convolutional or recurrent networks to time-series, or graph neural networks on network topology. Lastly, the application layer performs preventive (risk analysis, reliability evaluation) and reactive (fault detection, diagnosis, self-healing) functions. By organizing TN knowledge and data in layers, TelOps systematically incorporates topology and domain constraints into ML models, enhancing accuracy and generalization.

Scarce Failure Data: Mitigation Strategies

One of the biggest TN challenges is sparse labeled failures. Due to the fact that outages are important, networks are usually promptly repaired, hence few failure samples are recorded. TelOps and attendant research, therefore, employ data-centric and model-centric approaches:
Synthetic Data Generation: Failure samples can be realistically generated by generative models (GANs, VAEs). For example, conditional GAN/VAE models trained on optical network fault traces enhanced classification accuracy by >5% and F1 by >50% for infrequent failure classes. This synthetic oversampling levels classes and augments training data without labels.
Oversampling (SMOTE): Traditional oversampling methods such as SMOTE are applied sparingly. In a recent paper on microwave network faults, it was discovered that targeting SMOTE to particular fault classes (with precise data quantities) performed better than other approaches such as auxiliary tasks or autoencoders. This implies that bespoke synthetic enhancement can be highly effective.
Transfer Learning: TelOps makes use of knowledge from similar networks. A TelOps preventive task (risk analysis) states that fault-detection models developed in one TN may be directly transferred to another with little tuning.
Practically, a model learned on one vendor’s equipment or on a simulated network can be tuned on the target TN, bootstrapping limited data. Transfer learning has been promising in 5G O&M for cross-context sharing of fault-detection experience.
Unsupervised Anomaly Detection: For sparse labels, unsupervised learning identifies outliers. Autoencoder and clustering algorithms learn “normal” network activity and mark deviations as possible faults. For instance, LSTM autoencoders are applied to telecom logs to anticipate service-deteriorating anomalies (spikes in latency, packet loss) without fault labels. These kinds of anomaly models are alarms for infrequent problems. More advanced methods (e.g., Variational Autoencoders, GANs) can even produce synthetic anomalies for sparse faults.
A combination of these approaches assists TelOps in dealing with data sparsity, allowing ML models to anticipate and identify faults with few real-world instances.

AI/ML Techniques in TelOps

TelOps uses a variety of AI/ML techniques specifically for network data:
Supervised Learning: Classification and regression algorithms (decision trees, random forests, DNNs) forecast familiar fault types or performance indicators. For instance, classifiers based on labeled KPIs can detect particular hardware faults. TelOps’ ML layer commonly utilizes CNNs and LSTMs to learn spatial/temporal patterns in network data.
Unsupervised Learning: Anomaly detection and dimensionality reduction reveal latent anomalies. Autoencoders and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are employed for dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional logs to essential features, rendering real-time anomaly detection feasible. The models learn typical traffic signatures and detect deviations (anomalies) without supervision.
Reinforcement Learning (RL): RL solves adaptive control problems. In TelOps, RL agents may learn to re-tune network parameters (power levels, routing, resource blocks) following faults, or schedule maintenance operations. Research demonstrates RL can adjust autonomously for cell outages, optimize spectrum sharing, and power control adaptation, enhancing 5G network robustness. For example, Q-learning and Deep Q-Networks have been used in self-healing in LTE/5G, learning policies under evolving conditions.
Graph Neural Networks: GNNs inherently capture TN topology. Treating the graph of the network (nodes = switches/cells, edges = links) as input, GNNs learn relational structure. Pujol-Perich et al. present “IgnNition”, a system employing graph neural nets for network evaluation. In TelOps, GNNs are able to spread fault signals across the graph in order to localize root causes: e.g., a failure in a router impacts its neighbors. Embedding TN topology in GNNs enhances fault localization and routing optimization in contrast to flat models.
Knowledge-Augmented Models: Most importantly, TelOps embeds telecom domain knowledge into ML. This could take the form of feature engineering (e.g. graph topological features) or model constraints (e.g. protocol constraints baked into the network). TelOps knowledge layer guarantees ML models adhere to telecom regulations (time synchronization, link redundancy, etc.). This knowledge-infused learning has been demonstrated to improve generalization: in the TelOps case study, adding topology and expertise pushed diagnosis accuracy by ~28% compared to pure data-driven learning. Through the synthesis of these methods, TelOps systems are capable of learning from domain and data, which renders TN O&M AI strong, explainable, and effective.

Use Cases of TelOps

Predictive Maintenance: AI forecasts equipment degradation prior to failure. For instance, TelOps preventive activities encompass risk identification and risk evaluation (similar to predictive maintenance). ML models (e.g. LSTMs over time-series logs) predict cell/site failures, which support preemptive measures. AI-based predictive maintenance in telecom (anomaly detection, trend analysis) significantly decreases downtime and expenses. In operation, TelOps may employ historical KPI behavior to forecast a base station failure several hours in advance and initiate auto-switch to backup or send repair teams. Fault Localization (Root-Cause Analysis): When a network problem arises, TelOps quickly identifies the failing element. Reactive actions involve fault detection (detect anomaly) and failure diagnosis (detect root cause). For example, smart alarm correlation algorithms filter out a few thousand events to track down the origin of a fault. A hybrid AI framework used in the TelOps field trial correctly spotted the same LTE/NR switching breakdown in a 5G access network scenario more reliably than generic techniques.Overall, by marrying anomaly detectors with topology-aware inference, TelOps is able to locate faults (e.g. a core server fan failure inducing widespread outages) much quicker, significantly lowering Mean Time to Repair. SLA Assurance and Reliability: TelOps ensures service-level agreements through real-time assessment of network reliability. For instance, one of the TelOps tasks is reliability assessment of important components (e.g. base stations for autonomous driving use cases). Machine learning-based optimization algorithms adapt network setups in real time to satisfy QoS objectives. Machine learning can be used to track SLA metrics (latency, throughput) and forecast SLA violations ahead of time, enabling proactive load balancing. In this way, TelOps enables high-availability services (e.g. live video, URLLC) throughout the TN. Self-Healing Networks: The telco’s final TelOps application is autonomous recovery. Based on TM Forum’s Autonomous Network vision, TelOps empowers self-healing: when faults are detected, the network automatically detects and makes up for them with minimal human intervention. For instance, if a cell tower goes down, a TelOps RL agent might autonomously reassign its traffic to neighbors and reconfigure parameters to mitigate coverage loss. Pilot studies show that ML-driven self-healing (using RL and closed-loop control) can fully restore 5G coverage in simulations. Through the orchestration of anomaly detection, decision logic, and policy learning, TelOps achieves a self-healing network that corrects itself in real time, significantly enhancing uptime and user experience.

Conclusion

TelOps is a trailblazing AI system designed specifically for the specific O&M requirements of telecom networks. It methodically combines TN-specific knowledge (topology, protocols, expert rules) with cutting-edge AI techniques (deep learning, GNNs, RL) in a layered architecture. By addressing challenges like scarce failure data with synthetic examples and transfer learning, and by leveraging techniques from supervised to unsupervised to reinforcement learning, TelOps enables predictive maintenance, efficient fault localization, SLA assurance, and self-healing. Early studies show that TelOps can significantly outperform generic AIOps approaches: e.g. a 28% jump in fault diagnosis accuracy was observed when domain knowledge was embedded. With 5G/6G and edge computing on the rise, TelOps provides a model for more independent, fault-tolerant telecom networks. References: The above content is backed up by current industry and academia literature on AI in telecom. Notable references include Yang et al. (2024) presenting TelOps, research on data scarcity prevention, ML method surveys for network maintenance, and industry reports on AI-assured network assurance. All statements are quoted with the mentioned literature above.

Citations

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks
https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

Artificial intelligence advances in anomaly detection for telecom networks | Artificial Intelligence Review

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11108-x

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

Addressing data scarcity in ML-based failure-cause identification in optical networks through generative models – Welcome to DTU Research Database

https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/addressing-data-scarcity-in-ml-based-failure-cause-identification

https://www.politesi.polimi.it/retrieve/a53a6535-6ca4-4e1a-9d08-14bd2ef482b0/Thesis.pdf

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

Artificial intelligence innovations in anomaly detection for telecom networks | Artificial Intelligence Review

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11108-x

Artificial intelligence innovations in anomaly detection for telecom networks | Artificial Intelligence Review

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11108-x

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.02390

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.02390

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

(PDF) A Review of AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance in Telecommunications

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389630157_A_Review_of_AI-Driven_Predictive_Maintenance_in_Telecommunications

Revolutionizing Network Service Assurance: AI, ML, and Emerging Technologies – Capgemini USA

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

Revolutionizing Network Service Assurance: AI, ML, and Emerging Technologies – Capgemini USA

[2412.04731] TelOps: AI-driven Operations and Maintenance for Telecommunication Networks

https://ar5iv.org/pdf/2412.04731

Revolutionizing Network Service Assurance: AI, ML, and Emerging Technologies – Capgemini USA

Revolutionizing Network Service Assurance: AI, ML, and Emerging Technologies – Capgemini USA

Leave a Reply